WWE Royal Rumble 2014

WWE Royal Rumble 2014

The Road to Wrestlemania continues this Sunday with one of the last stops along with way in Pittsburgh, PA. As a few matches are already within the works and ready to go, the results of the PPV creates the mold for what's happening in the next few months and what becomes Wrestlemania, as everyone who follows WWE knows very well. Being Saturday evening, the PPV card is typically set, along with one or two changes between now and Sunday. I foresee a mid-title and a Diva's Championship match being added to the card, but at this point in time, would it really matter or change any draw for the event?

I didn't think so.

In any event, I prefer the Royal Rumble over any other pay per view as my top pick. Why? Because of the Rumble itself. For the past 26 years, the unpredictability of which wrestler appears next is what appeals to me, the unique structure of the match itself, and also the recent idea of inactive superstar returns. Who will be the next guy? Who will win? Granted, the winner is more often than not pencilled in within "striking distance" or written into the plot of the night, but the idea behind the Royal Rumble cannot be compared over anything. There are similar, smaller 15-man Battle Royals, yet the Royal Rumble event creates anticipation for me and employs the best showcasing out of all the superstars.

I am tuning in to see the surprise entrants. From Mick Foley, Mr. Perfect, Kharma, Diesel, and even last year's Chris Jericho returns, my mind is abuzz of who would return;

- The crows nest looks a little empty.
- Nothin' like an Irish Brogue, fella.
- The peeps! The peeps!
- Thirty years, brother! Eat your vitamins.
- The Rumble is in Pittsburgh. Oh, it's true. It's damn true.

And the final question: Who wins?

Now, I am lead to the card itself, outside of the Rumble. In my opinion, the rest of the card doesn't bring too much to the show. Individually, several superstars have grown in character, and have made something of themselves, but I don't see 5-star matches rising from the PPV where they should arise from.

Kickoff Show Match for the WWE Tag Team Championships:
Cody Rhodes & Goldust (c) vs. The New Age Outlaws

For the past few months, The Brotherhood have made each and every tag match I've seen them in more and more easier to watch. Cody Rhodes and Goldust have singlehandedly rebuilt the tag team division, and their stay power as champions have drawn more credibility to the gold. The Tag Team Championships have more credibility at this point than the US Championship. Why? Because they're always defended, and are defended within the quality of the match-ups in which they are defended in.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, the Kickoff show proudly brings to you an old-school taste of WWE Attitude with the New Age Outlaws. Throw in a Goldust in his prime and his younger brother, and this gets the crowd riled up, for sure. I like this match on paper, and I'm pretty sure that the match will be a great one. For nostalgia purposes, I'd love to see the New Age Outlaws take the win here, and for storyline purposes, it would be a fantastic way to build a storyline up with repetitive losses between the Brotherhood for a brother on brother match at Wrestlemania (as Goldust originally intended). I'm split 50/50 on this, because if and only if WWE decides to begin the brother to brother feud, the loss needs to happen now for a solid build up. Recently, Goldust had made a mention of pulling back his original request to feud with Cody Rhodes at Wrestlemania, but this may be just to deter the average smark away from the real match at Wrestlemania. Who knows.

All in all, I'm going with the New Age Outlaws as a D-Generation X rehash win to spark the feud between Rhodes and Goldust. It'll be very entertaining to see NAO back in action and working as tag champs.

Winner: The New Age Outlaws.

Daniel Bryan vs. Bray Wyatt

From what I've noticed, anything that develops with the Wyatt Family starts and finishes as a huge cluster of nonsense that drives me up the wall, as if WWE doesn't know what to do with the Wyatts but want to make them relevant. First it was Kane, then CM Punk and Daniel Bryan, now just Bryan alone. Whatever happened to CM Punk??

Oh, that's right. He's in his own feud that makes no sense with the Shield.

On top of that, Bryan joins the Family, and leaves not even a month later. What kind of madness is that?? It seems as though Vince McMahon and Triple H really are into the "bigger than life" wrestling superstars and want to leave the Indies where they should be on the mid-card, because Daniel Bryan has been pushed and buried, pushed and buried since Summerslam 2013. Take a step forward, then two steps back into the mid-card.

Drives me nuts.

Bryan needs this win to go over into the Road to Wrestlemania strong. Rumors are flying around that Sheamus is expected to return from his injury, and there will indeed be a rematch between both Bryan and Sheamus at Wrestlemania XXVIII. Hopefully it lasts longer than eighteen seconds.

On the other end, Bray Wyatt is rumored to face John Cena at Wrestlemania. Another oddball feud that comes out of nowhere! Again with the random attacks upon unsuspecting individuals. Granted, it's outstanding to see Cena take a step back out of the spotlight and become a team player, but the random feuds with the Wyatts are just to keep them relevant and in the eye of the general public.

Wyatt takes the loss to move on and build himself back up (and be buried by SuperCena at Wrestlemania), and Bryan needs the win to elevate himself into Wrestlemania.

Winner: Daniel Bryan

Big Show vs. Brock Lesnar

Another throwback from the beginning of the Ruthless Aggression era, with Big Show once again facing the likes of Paul Heyman and the Beast Incarnate--Brock Lesnar. Both superstars are older and wiser. Not sure if they're in better shape since the last time they collided, but if we get to see the ring collapse, I'll smile and mark out.

I'm honestly surprised Paul Heyman isn't more of a mouthpiece for Lesnar, reminding us with every piece of WWE programming that Lesnar is the man to beat, building up his client like a heel manager should. No wrestling. No competing until the Rumble. Just enough to gather such irritability and heat to make Show look like a hero lumbering from the Gorilla Position to the ring on Sunday.

Since returning, Lesnar has inserted himself in top-card feuds, slowly taking a step down in each feud. First Cena, then Triple H, CM Punk (with a win to his credibility), and now Big Show. Big Show needs to be dominated and destroyed. Why? Because Lesnar is having less and less of a meaningful match, and with the rumored match at Wrestlemania, he absolutely cannot lose.

Lesnar must look strong going into Wrestlemania, especially if he's challenging the streak.

Big Show has nothing lined up from here until the Big One. Maybe taking some time off? Time will tell.

Winner: Brock Lesnar

30-Superstar WWE Royal Rumble Match

As with every year, the Royal Rumble match is tradition for twenty six years, and the winner goes on to headline Wrestlemania. And what makes this Royal Rumble match so unique, is for the simple fact that there is no secondary title for the second place. That irked me about the brand split; why reward mediocrity? If you can't win the Rumble, you get squat. Get a number one contender for the World Heavyweight title at Elimination Chamber and move on.

This year, that won't be the case. Thirty men enter. One man leaves on top of the mountain. With the title unification, I am also curious to know if the Money in the Bank PPV will no longer be a PPV, and instead return at Wrestlemania?

Moving on to the match itself, the winner has all signs point to the returning superstar, Batista. His two year contract brings to the table a WWE World Heavyweight Championship run; why else would he return? A high payout and a chance to go out in style when and if he does leave. And Triple H made that happen as the Chief Operating Officer. I can only imagine being the fly on the wall listening to the phone call:

HHH: "Batista. Hey, listen. I want you to come back and wrestle for the WWE again. Leave that MMA bullshit. I'll make it worth your while."

Batista: "Hunter, I told you before--I don't want to wrestle for your father in law again. It's not worth it to me."

HHH: "Remember your last run here? You went out like a little bitch. Redeem yourself! Come back and show everyone you're the ANIMAL!"

Batista: "Hunter, no. I can't"

HHH: "How's a matching salaried two-year contract to Cena's, entry at #30 in the Rumble, and a WWE title run?"

Batista: "Fuck it. Deal!"

It's already inked in stone, and I can pretty much guarantee that's the scenario. Batista will enter as number 30, and clean house. I'd be more impressed if CM Punk pulled off what only Shawn Michaels and Chris Benoit have done in the history of the Rumble and goes on to win the match at #1. Eat that, Kane!

With the Rumble, my intrigue is not about the winning participant. It's about the unpredictability and bending the rules. I'm talking about the similarities of what Kofi Kingston does nearly every year and his creative ways to not be one of the eliminated participants.

WWE World Heavyweight Championship Match:
Randy Orton (c) vs. John Cena

I can't even count the number of times these two men have faced off against each other in their careers. It's old. It's boring. It's stale. Cena is always making his way into the main event. Orton does the same. Granted, they are outstanding performers, but Orton VS. Cena Rematch XXXIX needs to stop. It needs to be Orton VS Someone Else. And no more Cena, for at least six months. The match is already pencilled in for a win by Orton, but I'm interested to see how that happens. Does Orton win clean again like in TLC? Does Cena get the disqualification win? Or (I can dream), Orton gets the win by a Cena disqualification?

Either way, I'm not too thrilled about this. Lackluster at best for the build, and with Batista inserting himself into the mix, I hope that it's a solid build toward Wrestlemania.


That's all I got for you tonight, Spectators! Tune in to WWE's Royal Rumble tomorrow, January 26 2014! And to keep you entertained a little while longer, here is a little bit of Rumble Trivia for you!

Most Rumble Victories

Wrestler                 Royal Rumble Wins      Year
Stone Cold Steve Austin 3               1997, 1998, 2001
Hulk Hogan         2               1990, 1991
Shawn Michaels 2               1995, 1996
John Cena         2               2008, 2013


Longest Time Spent in a Single Royal Rumble
Top twenty individual superstar longest times in a single Royal Rumble match. As of the 2013 Royal Rumble.

Wrestler         Time         Year
Rey Mysterio 1:02:12 2006 (Went on to win it)
Chris Benoit 1:01:30 2004 (Went on to win it)
Bob Backlund 1:01:10 1993

Shortest Time Spent in a Single Royal Rumble

Wrestler                     Time Year
Santino Marella              0:00:01 2009


Most Eliminations in a Single Royal Rumble
Top wrestlers with most eliminations in a single match. As of the 2013 Royal Rumble.

Wrestler         # of Eliminations Year
Kane 11           2001
Hulk Hogan 10         1989
Steve Austin 10         1997


Total Eliminations in Cumulative Royal Rumbles
Top wrestlers with the most eliminations. As of the 2013 Royal Rumble.[95][verification needed]

Wrestler                 # of Eliminations Rumbles Entered
Shawn Michaels 39         12
Kane         38         16
Steve Austin         36         6


Most Rumble Appearances
Only wrestlers with at least 6 appearances are shown. As of the 2013 Royal Rumble.

Wrestler                  Rumbles Entered First Rumble Most Recent Rumble
Kane         16                 1996 2013
Shawn Michaels 12                 1989 2010
The Undertaker 10                 1991 2009
Rikishi         10                 1993 2004

The Animal Unleashed

Hello ladies and gentlemen, and welcome back to another round of the Wrestling Spectator. I have a few short topics that I'm going to smash together within one week (or two), so stay continued!

Batista is making a return January 20th, a little less than a week from the Royal Rumble, and this return won't be a short term deal--the rumor mill is speculating that this will be about a two-year deal for the Animal, facing off within main event status.

I mean, being who Dave Batista is, why would he come back unless it wasn't for TV exposure and in the spotlight picture? My question is, as with all the Ruthless Aggression (or any previous era) superstars, will Batista be utilized in the manner in which we are perceiving?

My sources say yes.

Batista is coming back for two reasons; a big payoff, and a proper send off. His last stint with the WWE had him taking his ball and going home like a whiny little b*tch playing second fiddle to John Cena, so more than likely, he's interested in a feel-good way to leave. And Triple H will see to it. Here in lies the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. He will be the next guy to be thrown into the pot for the belt, and my estimation is that he will carry it for quite some time. Within the past year, the WWE World Heavyweight Championship has been held by four different champions, and Cena held the title the most for a little over four months. Then Orton, then the Rock. I don't necessarily count the Rock as a legitimate champion because his reign was only transitional in order for Cena to gain his "retribution" taken care of and extend another run.

Triple H will make sure Batista takes the helm, much longer than his meager 35 day WWE Championship run back in 2010. More than likely, Batista will be pushed to the moon when he returns, possibly winning the Royal Rumble and headlining Wrestlemania. Of course, there are a few names passed around WWE corporate who are slated to win the Rumble (no Slater wins, sorry). Brock Lesnar being one. Sheamus being another (as a surprise entrant, I assume). Needless to say, I believe that the Royal Rumble will be an interesting mix of talent, new and old.

What will happen with Batista in the WWE within the next two years? Will Triple H control the powers that be and give Batista something he can proudly hang his boots on? Can "The Animal" defeat Randy Orton and become the new heel? Does he become a tweener and work as the "Anti-Hero"? Or does he allow the beast within to be released and demolish Cena (with or without Orton or the Authority) and the WWE locker room?

Time will tell. I am excited for Batista's return. Hopefully it's a great one.

Forbidden is the Promised Land

WWE's annual Royal Rumble pay per view is scheduled for January 26, 2014, giving a little more than a month to combine superstars from all over the WWE roster, and allow for some surprise entrants such as Booker T, Road Dogg, Big Daddy Cool Diesel, and others to name a few.

The Icon

This is also the same time of year where rumors are started about the legendary Icon, Sting, to jump ship from TNA to WWE's own ragtag group of misfits, solidify his career within four months with a defining moment at Wrestlemania, take his payout, and retire. Questions that circle around touch many different subjects, such as who does Sting face? When will he return? Will he be just a wrestler?

At this point, who knows. However, Sting currently is the oldest active wrestler between both rosters at 54, and the next oldest "active" wrestler is the Undertaker at 48, who at this point in time, isn't really active anymore (the oldest recurring "active" superstar for this statement to be legitimate would be Kurt Angle at 45). And therein lies the rumors--will Sting and Undertaker, the oldest remaining dogs in wrestling, battle it out at Wrestlemania 30? Or will Sting remain in TNA and retire?

These questions branch out to even more theories and oddball suggestions within the IWC. But my main question is, does Sting really want to venture into the wrestling Promised Land after twelve years of his original NWA/WCW home of fourteen years? Think about it... if Sting is given just four months to cement a legacy in the WWE after his expansive twenty-six year wrestling history, what could he possibly do to outshine all of it in that time frame? Is it even possible? Sensible critics say that the only way the Stinger can even equal all of this is by going toe-to-toe with the Phenom and defeating him on his own stage--in his own yard.

Would Sting come back and Beat the Streak?

Yes... that's right. Beating the Streak.

Granted, Sting doesn't need the rub. He doesn't need to be glorified to the extent of what a much younger superstar would benefit by putting down the biggest prize in all of the WWE. But who would benefit, rightly so?

One of the newer superstars? Someone in his mid-to-late twenties/early thirties to take down a man nearly twice his age and a fraction of his schedule? Disrespectful. Granted, a then-24 year old Randy Orton took on the Undertaker at Wrestlemania 21, but Undertaker himself was 38, in much better shape and actively wrestling then. Would have been a great birthday present for Orton to Beat the Streak (recently passed on April 1, 2005), but Orton became tally 13. Undertaker hasn't been in the best of shape, seen at Wrestlemania 29 against CM Punk. Triple H and Shawn Michaels did a number on the Undertaker in the years beforehand, and it shows. For the past ten years (save for Orton, and CM Punk), Undertaker has been pitted against opponents close to him in age.

John Cena? There have been talks about Cena facing the Undertaker for a while now, and has possibly been penned in for such a match, but does Cena need the rub from being in the match? Highly doubtful. John Cena has his own star power, and should be far away from anything Taker related.

Someone he's faced before? No. Frankly, Shawn Michaels was the only thing I could enjoy back to back

Would this possibly be the future for Sting as WWE Champion?

because the story behind it was legendary. Shawn Michaels WAS Mr. Wrestlemania, and Undertaker stood in the way of ultimate Wrestlemania history. Triple H (now a corporate big wig) placed himself in the Phenom's path three times in the past, and just needs to step away from the limelight. And what about our current WWE World Heavyweight champion? Randy Orton can be a surefire back up in case plans fall through, but it isn't necessary. CM Punk himself doesn't need another Taker feud, and everyone else on down the path of being his victims have become too old to make some relevancy.

Now before I get ahead of myself, if and only if Sting returns to the WWE, he needs to face the Undertaker. It needs to be booked for any sort of relevancy. IF it happens. Why? The WCW Icon who has never set foot in WWE territory facing the promotion's very own legend. Similar to an invasion angle, but this time, it's to settle the all-time question.

Of course, Vince McMahon won't let something from WCW beat him. Too proud. And quite honestly, I don't think Undertaker would job to Sting. But it would make for one hell of a storyline to entice Sting back. A WCW legend that never stepped foot in the WWE for over 26 years, comes to Vince's Promised Land, and beats the streak of WWE's own tailor made. It would be a huge slap in the face of the company, storyline intended, and if pitched the idea, I would guess Sting would no doubt go for it.

But that would be the only way Sting would be relevant in the WWE, and make something within a four month timeframe.

Now, this is all opinion on if Sting came to the WWE. My personal opinion?

Don't step one toe in the WWE. Retire as the only superstar that didn't need the machine. Make it to where

Is The Phenomenal One, AJ Styles
reaching out to the WWE?

the machine needed him. That's the biggest slap in the face of all. Speaking of, AJ Styles could benefit from not reaching out to the WWE. He has made an impact (in IMPACT! Ban pun, I know) outside of the WWE, and he doesn't need to join their ranks. Styles would be a "flash in the pan" superstar, and then minimized to the mid-card after a solid run.

I will reiterate; Sting is the oldest active wrestler to date; even Ric Flair himself "retired" from the WWE at 59, and Ric Flair had little steam left in him at that point. Sting has had an illustrious career outside of the WWE, and doesn't need a short term contract to possibly end his career on a high note. On top of that, Sting himself has expressed that he declined a contract from the WWE back in 2001 because he saw Booker T treated as a nobody by the Rock. Times have changed, of course, but would Sting be treated as a superstar? Or would he be buried by Taker, Cena, Orton, or even a rookie?

Today, World Wrestling Entertainment mass-produces and churns out superstars by the dozen. But before all this, there were several different promotions that people have made a name for themselves, and are synonymous with that company. There isn't a competitive domestic ship to jump from WWE, as TNA is much lower on the food chain than the corporate wrestling giant. However, the originals that stick with their company, who are loyalists and make a name for themselves create their own legacy and refuse to have a company defecate on their pride.

Sting is one of these superstars. AJ Styles can be another.

I would much rather Sting finish and hang his boots up in TNA. Accept an invitation to the WWE Hall Of Fame (since WCW and all rights are owned by WWE, I'd understand that), but never wrestle there. Sting's legacy has already tested the length of time. And his legacy should be known forever as the established Superstar who never wrestled for the WWE.

Thanks for reading, everyone! Stay tuned for more from The Wrestling Spectator, and follow us on Facebook!!

TLC 2013 Breakdown

Hello wrestling fans! It's been quite some time from my last article, but now I am ready, and back in action! Today, I will be reviewing the upcoming WWE pay per view "TLC". The main focus on this PPV is the unification of the World Heavyweight Championship and the WWE Championship once again, an event recreated from Vengeance 2001 with Chris Jericho becoming the first ever Undisputed WWE Champion by defeating then-World Heavyweight Champion The Rock, and then-WWE Champion Steve Austin.

We will have a new Unified Champion in the WWE, but who?

Dolph Ziggler vs. Fandango

I've noticed a lot of these "kick-off" shows that have former established superstars before the actual event. This sounds a lot like Sunday Night Heat in a way, but Heat was intended to start fresh wrestlers, not established main eventers. Both of these men have headlined Wrestlemania at one time or another, and now they're at the bottom rung of a PPV? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion of course, but with the high amount of diluted WWE programming is absurd. Simplicity is a key factor. WWE has their hands in so many cookie jars for advertising and marketing that it's unnecessary and bores the general public.

I'll get off my soap box, but this is a debate for another day.

Fandango and Ziggler shouldn't be this low on the card. It's outstanding to see them on the card at all, considering TLC 2013 is saturated with cheap bread, condiments, joined with a thin slice of cheese. No meat, all filler. In any event, this is the "kick-off" match to get things started for the PPV and liven up the crowd. Ziggler has been on a losing streak for four months ever since his break up with AJ (she goes up, he goes down) with the various mid-card championship chases. The guy can't catch a break, and now he's been delegated to face off against Fandango. I consider Fandango to be part of the "was promsing-less serious" aspects of wrestling--the Wade Barretts, Tensais, David Otungas... wrestlers that were destined for something great so long ago and part of what has been swept under the rug. Tensai(Albert) was scripted to to come back and demolish John Cena...

...never happened.

I can't tell who's going to win this one. Since Dolph is in a funk, and Fandango is on a similar path (spotted wins here and there), it'll be tough to decide. Frankly, I'm in high regard for Ziggler to make a win out of this one and get himself back in the title chase, and get away from wrestlers who have nothing going for them outside of your typical comedy act.

Prediction: Dolph Ziggler

Diva's Championship: AJ Lee(c) vs. Natalya

The Diva's division has slowly built itself up (and by slowly, I mean at a snail's pace) through the past few months, but I still can't help to use a bathroom break each time a cat fight breaks out on WWE TV. The Diva's division within the WWE hasn't turned a profit since the days of Lita and Trish Stratus, and even then, it wasn't a comparable dime to profit with...

...until Total Divas. The WWE-based reality show goes behind the scenes of half of the Diva division into their personal lives, and somewhat branches off into other superstars' lives as well (cue in John Cena and Daniel Bryan for starters). This employed idea ALONE grasps hundreds of people's attention because there is that hidden magic that no one sees outside of the typical WWE programming; what happens outside of RAW and Smackdown? This is, in my personal opinion, what is driving the vast majority to this show. It has been bumping the Diva's division little by little because of the outside exposure, but within the ring... I still see nothing that holds together any interest. All I see is a bunch of older high school girls squaking about their differences with a freshman who thinks she's Queen Bee.

Nonetheless, I think AJ Lee and the Diva's Championship has run its course. If WWE had maintained the power couple between her and Dolph Ziggler as World Heavyweight Champion, she may have more relevance and impact on the Diva's division. However, the WWE decided to go a different direction with Ziggles. It is time that we have a face Diva's champion, and with Natalya only having a little more than a one time, two month reign, it should be her chance to shine. Not only that, I hope by putting the title on Natalya, it will pull her away from that ridiculous clown disaster team of Hornswoggle and Khali.

Prediction: Natalya Neidhart

WWE Tag Team Championship; Fatal 4-Way Match: Goldust & Cody Rhodes(c) vs. Rey Mysterio & Big Show vs. Ryback & Curtis Axel vs. The Real Americans

A last minute championship addition to TLC 2013, this match has eight star powerhouses, and with so many egos clashing in one squared circle, it'll be a chaotic mess. An awesome chaotic mess. The tag division, in my personal opinion, has flourished into something much better from the past few years. Not as good as in the 90s, but definitely watchable. This is another match (outside of the main event) that I would definitely be tuning in to watch. Anything that I have watched within the past few months that have to do with the Rhodes brothers has made WWE that much more to stomach.

However...

Goldust has been lobbying for a Brother vs. Brother match before his return to the WWE. Is this still the Wrestlemania intent? Will there be any turn against one another at TLC? This should be playing in the back of every one's mind at the end of TLC. Then again, Cody and Goldust have been working very well together, and Goldust himself is in the best shape of his career and he fits in the tag team picture with his brother. Personally, I would absolutely hate this tag team to break up as it is a huge staple in the current development, but I think that it would put asses in seats. Some seats. A typical sibling rivalry, escalated in the ring over years of neglect from the American Dream.

Just an idea. I could be wrong.

Going down to the Big Show and Rey Mysterio, these two were frequently pitted against each other in tag matches and singles matches, even stemming to a "David vs. Goliath" match from a Big Show elimination at Survivor Series '05. So, by my research, this will be the first time that these two team up. Storyline wise, these two have been at it for quite some time, and now finally decide to team up for a quick tag team bout. I've seen much more weird things (the Rock 'N' Sock connection to be one of them).

The team of Ryback and Curtis Axel, I think, is a strong team, rebirthed as Paul Heyman "rejects". Not necessarily rejects in the sense that they may be quite a formidable tag team, and could dominate the division like the Rhodes have. I see big things in the future of these two superstars in 2014 if they stay relevant, and stay heels. Ryback and Axel can be like the school yard bullies starting trouble in the WWE Universe. I wouldn't mind to see these two as tag champs and pull off a nice little run, but we shall see.

The Real Americans I just cannot take seriously. Swagger has become a lame duck, and Colter is just a supporting comedic crutch. Cesaro is being pulled down in this whole comedy act, and has potential to be a part of something bigger. The Intercontinental Championship will become similar in prestige of the World Heavyweight Title, and much more individuals will be gunning after Langston (or future title holders), aching to bridge the gap between being an IC champion to the WWE Championship. And Cesaro should be part of that elite group. He's the only thing that keeps me interested in the Real Americans (that Cesaro Swing is killer, by the way), but as a group, it's just another wrestling faux pas that I get up and get a sandwich.

Prediction: It'll be a hard one, as usual with four way matches, and even more with tag teams. I'm going with the champs to retain.

Rhodes & Goldust: 70%
Ryback & Axel: 50%
Big Show & Mysterio: 40%
Real Americans: 20%

Intercontinental Championship: Big E Langston(c) vs. Damien Sandow

I liked the idea behind Cody Rhodes bringing back the "prestige" to the Intercontinental Championship (as all heels say that they will do sometime during their reign) and showcased the white IC title. However, I don't think that it fits well with Langston (or Curtis Axel, or any modern day champion). I am glad that Axel is no longer in the picture, and has made somewhat of a good tag team with Ryback (as "former" Heyman guys). With a little more fine-tuning, I'm pretty sure that Ryback and Axel would make for decent tag champs. But enough about what isn't to be. Axel is gone, and now WWE has pitted Langston against the "Savior of the Masses", Damien Sandow in a quick turn of events for the IC title. Langston is such a big guy, that I highly doubt Sandow will be able to knock him down off his championship run, and I see Langston as a credible Intercontinental title holder, and with being such, could be launched into the title picture. The upper card should be composed of very strong mid-card titles holder, and if Langston can hold his own, he'll be able to maintain a top spot in the WWE. It would be entertaining to see an Intercontinental Champion VS a WWE Champion match.

With that being said, and with John Cena having internal backing on the Big E, Langston will continue to hold the IC title for a long time, and dominate the mid-card.

Prediction: Big E Langston

CM Punk vs. The Shield (3-on-1 Handicap Match)

There is no reason that this match up should have even been booked. I understand the whole plot issue with both faces being punished, but between CM Punk and Bryan, it isn't needed. Honestly, this should have been a 2-on-3 handicap match for the Tag Team titles with Punk/Bryan and the Shield, continuing the IWC indy gloryfest storyline with Punk and Bryan since both superstars have been buried to mid-card players. As the 3-on-1 handicap went with the Big Show a few weeks ago, I don't see CM Punk tallying a win without some sort of outside interference from Bryan.

On the flip side of this match, the Shield have nothing better to do than to do Triple H's dirty work. As rumors have been floating around on the IWC, this is going to set up a future feud between Punk and Triple H, to which we will possibly see a continuation of the feud from Night of Champions '11. This also serves to be a temporary fix for the Shield to keep themselves relevant until their next task from the C.O.O.

Punk won't walk away from this one clean.

Prediction: The Shield

Daniel Bryan vs. The Wyatt Family (3-on-1 Handicap Match)

Another match up that really isn't necessary, but this one has a bit of build up and story behind it. It keeps Daniel Bryan busy until his "fair" WWE Championship rematch in 2014, and it builds the Wyatt Family up to be credible. Bray Wyatt, with the transformation from Husky Harris, has made something of himself as that creepy and sadistic persona--it's something that works for him, and it isn't too far out, or too cartoony. This is someone that could possibly be in the bayous of Louisiana in a horror flick.

Kidnapping aside, I think that Bryan will be "following the buzzards" after a nasty beat down and disappear for a while as what happened with Kane. Then again, Kane came back as a corporate big-wig, totally out of left field. Bryan will get the loss and disappear for a few weeks to allow a small program for Cena to develop (possibly a rematch clause from Orton) and squash real soon just in time for Bryan's return.

Prediction: The Wyatt Family  

WWE Unification Match: World Heavyweight Champion John Cena vs. WWE Champion Randy Orton (Tables, Ladders & Chairs Match)

What this PPV is all about. The ONLY match that people will be paying for, if they pay for this PPV at all. WWE is touting this to be a historic match eleven years in the making (Vengeance 2001). And no where in the TLC page describes anything about the original WWE/WHC Championship match... as if it never happened. There hasn't been any other mention of it even on television, Which is truly disappointing to say the least, because at Vengeance 2001 was a turning point in WWE's own history to finally unify the defunct WCW with the WWE.

This time around, the WWE is in need of one champion, one great individual that can be the target of the entire federation. With the brand split finally at an end, WWE feels that there isn't a need for two champions, as Cena and Orton respectively have shown up at both shows over the past few weeks, and this is simply to create and setup the next few months of programming and make it easier upon the writers.

This small feud started when John Cena began speaking in cahoots with The Authority (Triple H and Stephanie McMahon) and suggested that there be only one champion on November 25, sparking Randy Orton to lose what composure he had. Jumping to a small conclusion, Cena just wants to be WWE Champion again and to do away with the ridiculousness of the WHC title, but that's just my thoughts running through my head. The Authority thought of that to be a great idea (storyline wise anyway), and now at TLC, there will be a newly crowned WWE Unified Champion.

Between the two, John Cena and Randy Orton have had a long and storied clash since early 2004 (even before that in OVW), a lot of bad blood, and this will be a shining moment with both individuals, and will open up new possibilities and more feuds similar to that before the WCW/WWE Invasion storylines.

All in all, Cena will undoubtedly be the new WWE Unified Champion, and the "Face of the WWE". There were talks roughly ten days ago that there wouldn't be a crowned champion at TLC (pushing the storyline for the Unification out until Wrestlemania 30), but for simplicities sake, one champion is all is needed...

... for the time being. Needless to say, I feel that the TLC Unified WWE Championship match was a bit rushed, and that WWE Creative is struggling to put something together in a short amount of time. Deadlines change all the time, but the idea stays the same--At TLC, one man is walking away with two titles.

Prediction: John Cena


With a continuing thought, with no brand split and one WWE champion, I am interested to see usage of the United States Championship like the European Championship was back in the late 90s. Digging up some past archives during the Monday Night Wars, the only championships that were around at that point in time were the WWF Championship, the Intercontinental Championship, the European Championship, the WWF Tag Team championships, the Light Heavyweight Championship, and the Hardcore Championship. With the current set up, all the WWE is missing is the LHC, and the Hardcore championship, and since the WWE needs to stay PG oriented and has a new slew of cruiserweights in the roster, this would be the perfect opportunity to bring back the Cruiserweight title, and have those superstars still relevant. It creates a mix and variety of action (instead of having bruisers lumbering about for WWE title shots), and allows the WWE product to stay fresh and maintain interest in not only the flagship show of RAW, but the fast actioned pace of Smackdown... on how it used to be.

Thanks for reading! And see you at TLC!

Heat and Water

As I was beginning my musings on the upcoming TLC pay per view blog, I took a stand on my soap box and began a rant regarding the diluted programming of today's WWE and yester-years WWF programming. What was successful back then that could be used in today's era?

Understandably, if it isn't broken, don't fix it. But considering that there is so much advertising and marketing for the WWE right now, and with so many different programs that saturate our televisions at home, who can honestly keep track? WWE RAW; Smackdown; Main Event; Superstars; WWE NXT; AM RAW; and Total Divas, along with alternative programming overseas, such as Bottom Line, Afterburn, Vintage Collection, Experience, This Week in WWE, and Free For All. A total of thirteen programs, and where Germany and Austria show nine out of these thirteen! This total infiltration of WWE/TV is unnecessary and superficial, and not only does it pollute the airwaves, I would be hard pressed to think that this is also watering down what ratings RAW and Smackdown should be getting.

Case in point; from what I remember, about the time of the brand split, there was RAW, and Smackdown as your major shows. Then ECW/WWE (which was a poor rendition of what it should have been), Heat and Velocity. I'm not going to work with ECW as it was a rebirth disgrace that was beaten into the ground as a minor "C" show, but I will focus on Heat and Velocity for this blog.

A Velocity Moment Brought to you by Billy Gunn
and Mark Jindrak (07/17/2004)

At the point in time with a brand split, Heat and Velocity worked in tandem with their major counterparts, and allowed the lower mid-card some viable TV time, and even allowed new stars to come up from the rankings of OVW and FCW to showcase talent on TV. It was a minor pollution, and it kept the roster relevant. Heat and Velocity also allowed a handful of Cruiserweights to develop, even having a Velocity Cruiserweight Championship battle royal at one point in October 2005.

A battle royal of cruiserweights. I don't think there are even enough cruiserweights in the WWE to have enough for a battle royal.

The Olympic Gold Medalist makes his WWF Debut
on WWF Heat!

With the inception of the WWE Network, I can see the use of all this programming (plus tons more) allowed on a channel that displays 24/7 WWE wrestling. However, there has been rumor of the WWE network to be a premium channel. For those who aren't vastly rich or do not want to fork out a monthly fee for the service of the WWE Network, regular WWE TV should be limited to the two "A" shows within the week, a "C" show allowing nothing above mid card, and a recap of the week.

WWE Monday Night RAW.
WWE Friday Night Smackdown.
WWE Sunday Night NXT.
And Saturday Morning Slam.

Grand Master Sexay and Steve Blackman working together
on Heat. Mid-card talent used the right way on the
right show.

Whatever is left over should be designated to the WWE Network. Saturate that channel with all of the overflow for the hardcore and the nostalgic. And keep national TV simple. As there isn't a brand split any longer, and after Sunday's TLC pay per view, the WWE Champion can float over both shows, and be a target across the board. The Intercontinental title can stay specifically to RAW and be a top tier title defended solely on RAW, and the same idea goes for the US Championship for Smackdown. NXT should be influenced strictly by the rookies, lower mid-card, and cruiserweights, and can be the "kick-off" before a pay per view; and Saturday Morning Slam can have a continuation of NXT talent and a week's recap over one hour for those who missed all week (because the IWC doesn't have recaps and dirtsheets), or need a summary on a Saturday Morning.

This way, things stay simple, and WWE Creative could churn out much better storylines and programming on free TV. Just a thought, McMahon. I want to see the WWE product succeed just as much as the next fan, and this is why I take a few hours of my time, research, and write such compelling information with a non-profit stance. I bet anything TNA could take this same approach, SEPARATE THEMSELVES FROM THE NORM, and be a successful contender. But I don't see that happening. Not with the current management. Talent is there, mindset isn't.

Either way, this is my short rant before Sunday rears its head and presents to us a rushed and shameful product. But you'll get to hear that on Saturday. Take care, Spectators, and I will see you soon!

A Golden Dilemma

Too many or not enough?

This is an imposed question on many a fan in the WWE right now, with several titles running rampant on both RAW and Smackdown. Of course, with both shows seemingly melding together, the Internet Wrestling Community is split down the middle. Some say keep the titles the way they are, some say unify the titles and create more prestige within the company and turn up the competition.

Let's take a look at what is currently active in the WWE:

WWE Championship: RAW's flagship title, currently held by the Rock
World Heavyweight Championship: Smackdown's flagship title, currently held by Alberto Del Rio
Intercontinental Championship: RAW's secondary, currently held by Wade Barrett
United States Championship: Smackdown's secondary, currently held by Antonio Cesaro
Diva's Championship: Unified with the Women's Championship and contested on both brands, currently held by Kaitlyn
WWE Tag Team Championship: Unified with the World Tag Team Championships and contested on both brands, currently held by Team Hell No!

The Cruiserweight division is suffering
just as much as the Diva's division
without a title

Pretty simple set up here, with two titles on each brand, along with two more allowed to be contested on both brands. Give or take, a "maximum" of four championships can be contested on each show. Fair enough. But I have heard time and time again to unify the remaining titles and contest every one on both shows. I don't think this is necessarily a great idea, considering the vast amount of superstars, and the line to wait to get to any particular title. I do believe that the chase for the titles is completely wrong, but I am not creative in the sense to tell which title should be contested against what superstar.

Keep in mind that at one point in time, the WWE had twelve titles running about, during the WWE/WCW Invasion angle, double the amount of titles there are in the WWE right now. On top of what is still standing, you had the European Championship, the Hardcore Championship, the Cruiserweight, Light Heavyweight, and World Tag Team Championships. It was a ridiculous amount, and the WWE made it work. The WWE should take a piece out of TNA's cake, as they have a main, a secondary, a cruiserweight title, a women's single and tag championship. Women's tag championship really isn't necessary, but maintain the major and minor titles, bring some legitimacy to the up-and-coming cruiserweights, and the women's belt. I would even consider bringing back the Hardcore Championship in time for Extreme Rules, because with Linda McMahon not running for the Connecticut Senate seat, why protect the image any longer?

I don't believe that the titles be unified. I say, add more titles to give more of a variety in the WWE to make things more interesting! My idea would be as follows:

WWE Championship: Keep it on RAW as major
World Heavyweight Championship: Keep it on Smackdown as major
Intercontinental Championship: Put it on Smackdown as minor to build prestige in Smackdown
United States Championship: Put it on RAW as minor to build prestige on RAW
Cruiserweight Championship: Contest it on both shows, with the weight limit at 220 pounds
NXT Championship: Treat it as the "legitimate" Television championship and allow up and coming wrestlers on TV to fight for it
Hardcore Championship: Hardcore only
Diva's Championship: Contest it on both shows
WWE Tag Team Championship: Contest it on both shows

The NXT Championship; the stepping stone into the WWE

This set up would work wonders for WWE Creative, as it can keep every part of the roster busy and keep ideas flowing. There are two titles specific for each brand, which will keep at least eight to ten superstars occupied; all of the WWE Cruiserweights will be building themselves up... look at how Rey Mysterio, Chris Jericho, and Billy Kidman became famous; the NXT Championship will ultimately allow break-out developmental talent on television and build their own success into the minor title picture; and the Hardcore championship will bring out the tough and ruthless. Granted, I doubt the Hardcore Championship will ever be brought back to a WWE ring again, based on the PG environment and the WWE Disclaimer of "Don't Try This at Home", but it would be nice to see contested once in a blue moon.

The Monday Night Wars; WWE should take a look back
and consider what worked and what didn't in terms
of championship caliber superstars

If Triple H was thinking outside the box to work on ratings, as I am sure Vince McMahon and his team have done time and time again, he would go back and look at what gave the WWE the edge in the 8.1 Nielsen ratings back in April 1999. The competition of WCW and ECW has been gone for some time, but examine and run through the compelling elements that maintained such a drastic climb. The WWE kept ratings in the 6's and 7's for over a year. What they did back then was hold a captive audience. The championships, outside of being props, shouldn't be labeled as such a term; Championships should be revered as the next point in a superstar's career, and have them climb the ladder rungs one by one. From NXT to Minors, to versatility in Hardcore, up to the grande queso enchilada.

Simply put, don't unify. Reinstate.

DUI Insanity

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." ~Albert Einstein 

Let me rattle off a list of wrestlers here (don't mind the duplicates);

Jim Duggan
Iron Sheik
Grandmaster Sexay
Eddie Guerrero
Alex Riley
Buff Bagwell
Chris Jericho
Gregory Helms
Christopher Daniels
Eddie Guerrero
Jeff Hardy
Jimmy Uso
Kurt Angle
Kurt Angle
Marty Jannetty
Matt Hardy
Lex Luger
Santino Marella
Scott Hall
Ted DiBiase Jr.
Test
Jack Swagger
Jimmy Uso

Jack Swagger's Mug Shot

This is just a mere handful of WWE Superstars that have been busted for driving under the influence. Recently, we have had DUI stamped across the forehead of Jack Swagger and Jimmy Uso, whose arrest has been his second for DUIs. There is a bigger list of wrestlers that have other charges attached to their criminal record, but I'm just going to focus on the DUI's for right now, as this has become a major problem in the WWE with no public ramifications  As a wrestling community, we were all awaiting the gavel to be dropped down on the head of Swagger after his arrest with marijuana. But, nothing has happened. Then, Jimmy Uso is recently arrested with a DUI. Did he honestly think that he could get away with it in the WWE like Swagger did with little to no punishment?

Quite possibly. Without being upper management in the WWE, the IWC never had an idea of any major punishment to Swagger. He is even getting a PUSH into the main event picture with Dutch Mantel and Alberto Del Rio. Jimmy Uso might just have had the crazy idea to think, "Well, Swagger is getting a main event push. Maybe I'll get the chance to get some star exposure if I'm caught doing something reckless!" This can't be the thinking behind every superstar because another is getting away with such an action. I don't condone the fairness of doing something in the real world illegally and being praised for such actions. Honestly, I don't see Swagger and Zeb Coulter getting over much with the fans on a poorly executed storyline. It works... if executed right. If and when all the pieces of the puzzle fit, the storyline can be great. If the US Title was on Swagger, and he was going for the World Title, Creative would have more steam going into this. But Swagger wasn't punished.

Why the WWE doesn't employ the creative fan like me, I don't know.

Jimmy Uso Mug Shot

Now, we have Jimmy Uso. When will the WWE start cracking down on the negligent superstar? Of course, I see a hailstorm of issues coming to rain down on the head of the this Uso brother. But, where is the fairness? Jimmy Uso, if terminated/suspended/fined/etctera, will no doubt claim that the penalty is unfair because of the situation with Swagger. Then what will happen? Will this be a benchmark of what is considered fair in the WWE? If this is the case, I can see many superstars go out, get themselves arrested, be handed their pink slip, lose their title, or TV time, and cry out, "Well, Swagger got away with it!" Understandably, there have been numerous superstars (see above list) that have either been released, repackaged, or whatnot because of their idiocracy and dabble in the drug influences, and have been only given a slap on the wrist. But there isn't any consistency. It's like punishing a child for getting an "C" in school, and taking his brother to Chuck E. Cheese's for getting a "D".

WWE's Corporate Policy states the following (truncated for importance):

"Any WWE Talent, who is arrested, convicted or who admits to a violation of law relating to use, possession, purchase, sale or distribution of drugs will be in material breach of his/her contract with WWE and subject to immediate dismissal. 

In addition to the penalties that may be imposed pursuant to his/her contract with WWE, a violation of this Section may also be treated as a positive test for drugs prohibited by this Policy and therefore, subject to the penalties set forth in Section 15 of this Policy." 

"If a specimen of a WWE Talent tests positive for a prohibited substance... the Program Administrator will advise that he/she is suspended (or as the case may be terminated) in accordance with the provisions of the Policy. The PA then advises WWE of the matter and WWE informs the PA of the applicable suspension dates or termination date."

http://corporate.wwe.com/company/abuse_policy.jsp

This, right here, should be mandatory for all WWE personnel, and be practiced with consistency. This way, if you screw up and get arrested, you get put on notice, you get put on with negative media, and is given a suspension or termination paperwork. Otherwise, the WWE will be run a muck with drunken and drugged up superstars with no remorse. The Wellness Policy was put into place for a reason; the WWE initiated the program to better assist talent and to prevent accidents or even death. They did this for Eddie Guerrero; the Wellness Policy saved MVP's life with a routine check; this has benefited the entire WWE. Now, the WWE seems to turn a blind eye as of late. Is this possibly because Linda McMahon isn't running for politics anymore that the WWE is slowing down their inspections?

In account of fairness, both Swagger and Jimmy Uso need to be held accountable and be used as a demonstration of getting back into the corporate spill of things. Otherwise, the WWE may be held accountable for another death.

WWE Yard Sale of TNA Superstars

I rarely cover TNA Wrestling, and I have been deterred from Impact programming because of the exact reason; My observation is seeing TNA taking WWE's scraps and "re-polish" into their own stars. Now, I see that this has immense potential, if used correctly, BECAUSE the WWE has trained these superstars and has taken the work out of having a developmental territory. Ohio Valley Wrestling has been taken over by TNA as their official training grounds, but again... OVW was originally the primary developmental facility to the WWE! OWV trained the likes of Brock Lesnar, Randy Orton, Cody Rhodes, Batista, and even John Cena to name a few. Being led by Al Snow and Rip Rogers in OVW, one would think that TNA doesn't need to dig through Vince McMahon's remains.

Even through his struggles, Jeff Hardy
remains TNA World Heavyweight
Champion!

But look at TNA's top men. The TNA World Heavyweight Champion is a WWE discard. Jeff Hardy was being successfully coached by Triple H and being prepped for his WWE title run. Drugs and injuries limited Hardy in his run, and he left for a lighter schedule to TNA. Eight months after his return to TNA, he became the TNA World Heavyweight Champion. TNA was smart in this acquisition; Jeff Hardy brought his fan base over to TNA, and he draws there. Even with all of his drug concerns and court dates, TNA chooses to keep Hardy on top because he needs to be. For business.

The current Television champion is another WWE wash; Devon Hughes. Well known as part of the "Dudley Boyz" with Bubba Ray, he's on top of the third time branded Television Championship. And looking back, again with the WWE throwing away talent, the Television Championship was introduced as a "Legends" Title by none other than Booker T, and was held by Mick Foley and Kevin Nash. Currently, TNA's roster holds over 20 former WWE superstars, with plenty of TNA Alumni that are also WWE Alumni. Then, you have major players of the game like Kurt Angle, Rob Van Dam, Mr. Ken--er... Anderson, several divas, and even Earl Hebner, occasionally sporting a "Damn Right I Did" T-Shirt (which is pretty awesome, by the way), alluding to his involvement the Montreal Screwjob. All former WWE superstars.

Finally, you have the granddaddy WWE relic of them all; the ultimate, self-absorbed individual who immerses himself in everything he can because not that he needs to, but that he wants to. I am talking about Hulk Hogan. Don't get me wrong... I respect the man over all he did in the WWF/E back in the 70s, 80s, and early 90s, when times were great and Hogan couldn't book based upon his popularity. However, I believe that he was part of the destruction of WCW (along with a bunch of other things), as he refused to do several things, such as let other superstars defeat and go over him clean (refusing to job to Jeff Jarrett in WCW), the famous "Fingerpoke of Doom" (see video enclosed) match against Kevin Nash in 1999, and just the overall hand in his own Creative control. Being a fan, I could absolutely be wrong about Hogan, as I don't know him personally, but from hearing many things about his past, he is a rigid worker as far as the business is concerned. With his current run with TNA, Hogan has been given nearly ultimate control and has been involved and booked himself (and now his daughter Brooke) in several different angles, and not being a "General Manager" like he should be. I hope for Dixie Carter's sake that TNA survives the Hogan Era.

OVW has been elected as the Official Development
Territory for TNA Impact

TNA has been dipping in pieces of the WWE's own disposal for several years now, and have failed to utilize the salt-and-pepper talent that the WWE has no need for. Such is the case with the discovery of TNA's VP of Ace's and Eights. D-Lo Brown himself was a mid-card wrestler back in the late 90s, and again, didn't account to much outside The Nation of Domination with the Rock. Why bring a road agent/mid-carder who is now in his 40s into the ring? It may make sense to some, but taking what the WWE has washed their hands of isn't what TNA was founded on. It's absolutely thrilling to know that AJ Styles, Samoa Joe, Abyss, and a couple of others have been with TNA since the beginning, and I am happy for the fact that TNA now has a training ground to bring up new and fresh talent the "Impact" way, and not keep digging into the WWE graveyard. It will be a while, of course, but TNA needs to work on the talent in OVW and leave what McMahon doesn't need any more. The wrestling is there. The wrestlers can put on five-star quality matches.

TNA needs to work on creating a future Batista, Orton, or Cena in OVW, refrain from cultivating talent that hasn't been seen since the 90s, and take away some of the creative demolition from Hogan. These will be some start to success with TNA. It won't be immediate, but everything is a process. Rome was not built in a day.

A Paul Bearer Tribute

Willim Alvin Moody (April 10, 1954 - March 5, 2013)

William Moody was quite possibly one of the best managers in the WWE ever since its inception. Better known as Paul Bearer (pun off pallbearer off of his mortuary gig he undertook as a degree in mortuary science and as a funeral director), and Percy Pringle III, Moody took under his wing multiple superstars in his twenty year-plus tenure,  some of which that have gone on and main-evented in the WWE, such as Rick Rude, Stone Cold Steve Austin (as Stunning Steve), Kane, and of course, The Undertaker. With all this said, Moody leaves behind a legacy that no one else can fulfill. Ohhh yeahhhh!!

Moody became famous after he took his Percy Pringle character and ran with his funeral parlor gimmick, inspired by his own interests for mortuary sciences, ultimately becoming Paul Bearer. Bearer was seen always carrying an urn, which developed an eerie gimmick of Bearer carrying the Undertaker's ashes, or soul, and even led to many storylines of Bearer having his urn taken away for some reason or another.

Some of Paul Bearer's best alliances were the back-and-forth between the Undertaker and Kane. Introducing Kane as Taker's half-brother as a hidden secret between himself and the Undertaker was the beginning of the Brothers of Destruction, and both Undertaker and Kane have demolished the foundation of the WWE many times over the past twenty years.

The Undertaker walks into Wrestlemania against CM Punk in a month's time. One can only wonder that Bearer be in the Dead Man's corner in sprit.

Paul Bearer

The Wrestling Specator sends their deepest condolences to the Moody Family. You will be missed.

The Bell Tolls For CM Punk

It is official; CM Punk VS The Undertaker

The stage has been set, and the gauntlet thrown; we have a superstar to challenge for the Streak this year, and it goes to CM Punk. With a clean win over Randy Orton on the Old School RAW. Even though that this match was already slated in the cards, and rumored about for a while now... I am excited to see this match up happen. It's not the championship match, but it does establish something else for Punk if he breaks the streak. Again with last night, when Wrestlemania season rolls into town, the Undertaker becomes a target. Who doesn't want to cement themselves in the wrestling history books with the likes of Bruno Sammartino and Buddy Rogers as the guy who broke a twenty year streak? Considering the names that came out and wanted a piece of the Undertaker's Wrestlemania legacy (Orton, Sheamus, and the Big Show), CM Punk put away Orton on a distraction. This ultimately made Punk look strong in a top-tier match against superstars who have all been multiple former champions. Count 'em... there have been over 40 championship reigns between those four men. And to think, Mean Mark Callous was winning championships back when most of these competitors (outside of the Big Show) wer in grade school, and with CM Punk winning and going to Wrestlemania would be a happy medium with a fresh face versus Taker, as the past four years have seen rematches of Shawn Michaels and Triple H. Glad to see something new.

With fresh being one of the topics at hand, how fresh is the Undertaker? Considering his tenacity for the past four years against two solid competitors, Taker has performed amazing matches with HBK and HHH, and didn't disappoint. However, we all saw Undertaker barely walk away from his last match with Triple H.  How much fuel does Taker have left in his tank? Will this match with CM Punk be just as, if not better, than his last? Will the WWE allow him to keep the streak intact? Or does the Undertaker realize that he isn't in the best shape to continue five-star quality matches any longer? Outside of his appearance at RAW 1000, a year long hiatus for the Undertaker may not be enough. This may be the time for the Undertaker to pass the torch to Punk and walk away with his first Wrestlemania loss.

Now, let us take a look at the challenger. Any superstar, even Gillberg and the J.O.B. Squad would be solidified as amazing to put away the Undertaker and his streak (but it would devalue Taker immensely), but this is no ordinary challenger--this is CM (Chick Magnet) Punk, a man who carried the WWE Championship longer than anyone within the WWE in the last 25 years. Punk has credibility as a wrestler, and has established himself as a legitimate threat to many in the locker room. Best In The World would BE Punk, hands down, save a win over the Undertaker at Wrestlemania. Of course, looking into the past, there have been numerous threats in the Dead Man's way. The Heartbreak Kid and Triple H have been massive road bumps recently, to which Taker did not walk away from the past four Wrestlemanias that easily. It showed his age, and that he is getting up there with the rest of the Legends. But, I digress.

If Punk puts away Taker, you might also have someone else to thank for his historic win; Paul Heyman. If you are an avid reader of my long-winded spectacle, I am a fan of Heyman and his "managerial" talent. Even after all the twinkie tits and walrus references from the Rock, he takes everything in stride and he is amazing when it comes to acting and reacting. He is the prime onscreen definition of the word "slimeball". However, with all that is said, Heyman has been with Punk since September 2012, and has made waves for CM Punk. My question is, with Heyman in Punk's corner, will this also play as a factor in Punk's win/loss? Heyman is very diabolical, as with his encounter with the Dead Man back in 2002 with Brock Lesnar. Heyman himself had tried several times to disarm Taker and request from Mr. McMahon different ways to disallow  Undertaker from using a cast on his hand that Brock had injured. As Vickie Guererro and "creative" are so haphazard and disorganized, I'll be hard pressed to see what disadvantage, if any, she will put the Undertaker in. I was even half-expecting the Shield to come out and raise hell for the Undertaker at Punk's behest.

It is what it is. I'm very interested in seeing what happens at Wrestlemania, as this event is no longer something mentioned in passing; it is Undertaker's legacy.

The Streak
(Forgive the errant Win/Loss column... doesn't factor right in Google Blogger)

VII Jimmy Snuka 1–0

VIII Jake Roberts 2–0

IX Giant González 3–0

XI King Kong Bundy 4–0

XII Diesel 5–0

13 Sycho Sid 6–0

XIV Kane 7–0

XV Big Boss Man 8–0

X-Seven Triple H 9–0

X8 Ric Flair 10–0

XIX Big Show & A-Train 11–0

XX Kane 12–0

21 Randy Orton 13–0

22 Mark Henry 14–0

23 Batista 15–0

XXIV Edge 16–0

XXV Shawn Michaels 17–0

XXVI Shawn Michaels 18–0

XXVII Triple H 19–0

XXVIII Triple H 20–0

XXIX    CM Punk ???

The Show Must Go on

(At least) Most of us understand that in the world of wrestling, rather in the WWE, about 80% of the business is scripted. That is the "entertainment" side of it, as it mostly an act. However, outside instances from wrestler's lives can alter the scripted outcome of what has already been written. That again, is the "entertainment" side of the business  And that is the beauty of it all; scripts can be changed and whipped up in a heartbeat. Even with wrestlers at the Gorilla Position.

Such is the case with Jack Swagger. A lot of buzz is happening and being spoken around the guy, and yet, there has been no "known" punishment given to Swagger to the public eye. That's where the politics side of it all happens. At this point in time, it is apparently the case that the WWE is going forward with the Swagger push and holding off on his suspension, as it seems as if it is, again, "good for business" as upper management sees fit. Of course, I would not hesitate to agree with Creative.

"But TWS? Why would you AGREE with allowing Swagger to evade punishment and get his push? This isn't fair to the other wrestlers who have been charged with suspensions and such!!" Although this isn't fair to plenty of superstars on the WWE roster, Swagger and Zeb Colter (Dirty Dutch, by the by) have garnished enough heat in the media with Glenn Beck and within the locker room "kayfabe" with Del Rio to keep this run up and not ditch it in the circular file. Therefore, in the eyes of WWE Creative, the show must go on. When Swagger no longer proves to be useful, then they'll slap on whatever punishment that they feel needs to be administered, if there hasn't been already.

Regarding the show, however, Swagger seems to have taken a backseat. In typical Superstar/Managerial roles, Swagger should be the one sending the message, and Colter the mouthpiece. Swagger is showing to be Colter's muscle in the vignettes  and Colter is sending the message, a la Shawn Michaels and Diesel. I believe this works for

Swagger, as he isn't too eloquent on the microphone, and Colter delivers points home time and time again in a controversial All American Tea Party influenced storyline. He has even caused a stir with Glenn Beck, who is a conservative commentator on his own radio show. As "The Atlantic Wire" mentions, Beck is losing the war with the WWE, as the radio host doesn't see the transparency and the "kayfabe" script of what the WWE has created. Co-Commentator Stu Burguiere argues the fact that back in the Golden Era, the WWE had created a storyline similar to this, but with the shoe on the other foot;

“Wouldn't the argument be, I mean at least one of the arguments would be, okay, they’re trying to create villains. They do this all the time. They are trying to create a villain. Like when I was a kid, I remember, like, the Iron Sheik. And the Iron Sheik was from I think Iran and he was always saying terrible things about America. Now, that didn’t mean the WWF at the time didn't like America. They were trying to make a villain out of the Iron Sheik, right? But this is different. It seems that the villain, the guy you’re supposed to hate, is this stereotype of a conservative that I've never met."

  WWE Creates Controversial Tea Party Character

Burguiere is right, but hardly anyone ever goes back to happier times when the WWE was with cartoon villains attempting to take over the wrestling universe. So, ever the opportunist, WWE offered a spot for Beck to have a chance to speak on RAW, to which Beck supposedly turned down. Therefore, WWE brought the fight to Beck's radio studio to get a chance for Beck to publicly state his opinion on the WWE's venue!

With so much controversy over Swagger's arrest, and then the immediate "pipe-bomb" that Colter and Swagger have already ensued, this is television. This is a storyline worth investing, and why dump Swagger in the suspension pile when this is running on all eight cylinders? There is no rhyme or reason, and most likely, just to keep the Tea Party going, Swagger must have had already agreed to something when he made his return. You don't see the man being buried immediately after his run in with the lawman; you see him dominating like nothing ever happened. And whether or not Alberto Del Rio makes a triumphant victory at Wrestlemania against a (potentially seeming) racist faction, this will continue. It works, and the show must go on.